ISW: Kremlin demands Ukraine give up territory Russia doesn’t control

The Kremlin continues to demand that Ukraine cede Ukrainian territory that Russia does not currently occupy while creating conditions for additional territorial demands, according to a report by the Institute for the Study of War (ISW) on 19 March.
Russian business outlet Kommersant reported on 18 March that its sources revealed Russian President Vladimir Putin stated at a private meeting with the Russian Union of Industrialists and Entrepreneurs Congress that Russia would not claim “Odesa and other territories” if unspecified countries recognize Ukraine’s Donetsk, Luhansk, Zaporizhzhia, and Kherson oblasts, and Crimea as part of Russia.
Putin and other Russian officials have recently reiterated their demand that Ukraine surrender the entirety of these four oblasts, including areas that Russian forces do not currently control, ISW notes.
The think tank assesses that the Kremlin may have intentionally leaked Putin’s statement to Kommersant to portray Russia’s demands to seize the entirety of the four oblasts as reasonable compared to alternatives.
Putin recently stated that the so-called “Novorossiya” is a vital part of Russia, with Kremlin Spokesperson Dmitry Peskov defining it as all of eastern and southern Ukraine, including Odesa Oblast. Putin has often used this term for occupied Ukrainian regions, most recently thanking Russian Prosecutor General’s Office employees in “Donbas and Novorossiya” during a 19 March address. He has also called Odesa City a “Russian city.”
West Maintains Unity on Ukraine’s Participation in Peace Negotiations
The US, Ukraine, and Europe continue to agree that Ukraine and Europe must be involved in peace negotiations to end the war, despite Russian President Vladimir Putin’s efforts to exclude them from such talks, ISW noted.
On 18 March, Bloomberg reported, citing people familiar with the matter, that US officials told European counterparts that the EU must be part of any peace agreement, as Russia seeks sanctions relief. The US emphasized stopping the fighting first, then discussing Ukraine’s security arrangements.
Also on 18 March, US President Donald Trump told the Washington Examiner that both Russia and Ukraine must agree to a “full ceasefire and peace deal,” rejecting Putin’s call for bilateral ceasefire talks with the US.
Related:
- After failed mineral deal, Trump proposes US takeover of Ukrainian nuclear plants
- ISW: Russia and Ukraine have not finalized long-range strikes ceasefire
- UK to host closed meeting on Ukraine peacekeeping force
- Politico: Putin agrees to hockey games with Trump while rejecting full ceasefire in Ukraine
- Kremlin supporters celebrate Trump’s negotiations as Russia rejects full ceasefire and continues attacks
- Russia claims adherence to energy strike truce after Trump-Putin call while accusing Ukraine of violations
You could close this page. Or you could join our community and help us produce more materials like this.
We keep our reporting open and accessible to everyone because we believe in the power of free information. This is why our small, cost-effective team depends on the support of readers like you to bring deliver timely news, quality analysis, and on-the-ground reports about Russia's war against Ukraine and Ukraine's struggle to build a democratic society.
A little bit goes a long way: for as little as the cost of one cup of coffee a month, you can help build bridges between Ukraine and the rest of the world, plus become a co-creator and vote for topics we should cover next. Become a patron or see other ways to support.